<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Variability Studies with International Networks</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY LANG="EN">
<P>
<hr>
<center><h1>Variability Studies with International Networks</h1></center>
<center><h3>Fran&#231;ois R. Querci and Monique Querci</h3></center>
<center><i>Observatoire Midi-Pyr&eacute;n&eacute;es, 14, Av. E. Berlin,
Toulouse, France</i></center><p>
<hr>

<BLOCKQUOTE> <B>Abstract</B><BR> 
        Generally speaking, variable stars are monitored through
observing campaigns which coordinate multi-site telescopes at various
longitudes. A new practice is to use networks of robotic telescopes devoted
to these programmes.
In this issue of <I>African Skies</I> we review these technologies, and in
the next issue we will
emphasize the NORT (Network of Oriental Robotic Telescopes) project,
which we are promoting in north African and middle-eastern countries.<BR>
<P>
(This paper is drawn from the Proceedings of IAU Symposium 177 on
<I>``The Carbon Star Phenomenon''</I>, held on May 27-31, 1996, in Antalya, Turkey;
editor: Robert F. Wing; to be published by Kluwer, 1997.)
<P>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<H1><A NAME="SECTION00010000000000000000">1. Introduction</A></H1>
<P>
For over a decade, coordinated international campaigns have taken place from
sites with sufficient longitude and latitude coverage and/or with
various instruments working at complementary wavelengths. The aim is to
monitor variable stars as continuously as possible to reduce the
aliasing problems bound to observations at a single site.
The final goal is to study and to understand their pulsational behavior,
given that the pulsation on the star's surface probes its interior
structure and composition in the framework of asteroseismology.
<P>
<H1><A NAME="SECTION00020000000000000000">2. Advantages of Campaigns</A></H1>
<P>
Coordinated campaigns with existing telescopes give better tools to
solve scientific problems by allowing one :
<UL><LI> to compare individual observational technologies such as CCD cameras,<LI> to compare data reduction procedures,<LI> to develop methods for filling gaps in data (<I>e.g.</I> Horne and Baliunas,
1986; Serre et al., 1992) due to local bad weather conditions,<LI>  to develop period-finding techniques, such as Fourier analysis, least
squares of brightness residuals (LSR), etc., adapted to the observed
objects with single and multiple periods or in more complex situations
as variable periods, flares, semi-regularity, etc. 
</UL>
<P>
Multisite campaigns also lead to a better international organization of science, since they
are based on cooperative programmes among  many experts in various
scientific and technical fields : theoreticians, observers, engineers.
<P>
They are valuable for training of young observers, PhD students and
young research associates, who follow the scientific evolution of the
project, from programme definition though to the interpretation of the results, and so
enabling them to choose their own speciality.
<P>
Some campaigns give access to multiwavelength techniques. They are
dedicated to various wavelength intervals by using space telescopes
(<I>e.g.</I> on board of IUE, ROSAT, HST satellites, etc.), as well as many
small- and medium-sized existing ground-based telescopes around the
world.
<P>
In a word, they produce best science.
<P>
<H1><A NAME="SECTION00030000000000000000">3. Drawbacks of Campaigns</A></H1>
<P>
The main drawbacks of multisite campaigns should be summarized as it follows.
<P>
Many nights are lost by cloudiness as some existing telescopes are not
in the best sites in the world.
<P>
The costs are important due to overhead and associated expenses such as
travel and accomodation costs for observers going to faraway observatories, or
equipment maintenance or replacement.
<P>
There are considerable handling requirements to mount and to dismount
instrumentation, to transport equipment to distant observatories, and to adapt it
to various existing telescopes.
<P>
In fact, these costs and handling are so high that they seriously
restrict the possibility of numerous campaigns per year. As examples, we
cite the 
WET (<I>Whole Earth Telescope</I>) campaigns (Sullivan, 1995) with white dwarfs
as prime targets and delta Scuti STEPHI (<I>Stellar Photometry
International project</I>) network campaigns (Belmonte et al., 1994). These and
other campaigns are run only once or twice by year or even once biannually for
about one week duration.<BR>
<P>
In consequence : - only one or a few stars are monitored during a
campaign, - the analysed stars are short-period variables such as :
white dwarfs, delta Scuti, RoAp, post-novae, cataclysmic stars, etc.,
having periods of some seconds to a few hours or days.
<P>
Some technical pitfalls could be added if the scientific
organization is badly coordinated, as for example when data from different
sites are reduced by different techniques, or obtained by not
sufficiently similar instruments from different sites, or even on the same
site in a long-term monitoring programmes as emphasized by Young (1994).
<P>
Problems bound to coordinated observing campaigns are reviewed for
example by Sterken (1988) and by Breger (1992, 1994).
<P>
<H1><A NAME="SECTION00040000000000000000">4. Variability Observational<BR> Status for Red Giants</A></H1>
<P>
As the coordinated international campaigns run one or two times a year
for about a week at a time, they are not adapted to the red giants. So, it is
not surprising that this subject does not appear in the literature on
cool stars. Even variables as Miras can appear `unfavourable
for long-term projects' as stressed by Szabados (1994). However, it is
encouraging that a first step was recently done for the solar-type stars
by the presentation of a new project, the SONG (<I>Stellar Oscillations
Network Group</I>) (see the Madison Meeting of the AAS, 9-13 June, 1996).
<P>
Roughly speaking, what do we know about the red-giant variability ?
<P>
Red giants have long periods of about one year. Superimposed on the
well-known long period are also shorter periods, say of a month to a few
months. Moreover, they can show rapid or slow period changes, a critical
behaviour around phase 0.7-0.8 in the case of Miras, flares and very
rapid variations over a day or less (for example, see a review by
Querci, 1986).
<P>
This knowledge was mainly obtained by single ground-based sites
dedicated to long-term monitoring programmes of observations.
Let us quote some of these programmes:
<UL><LI> the pioneer photographic observations made by Campbell,
Cannon, Hetzler, Merrill, Payne, etc.,<LI> the visual photometry contributions made by amateur-astronomers associations such as AAVSO,
AFOEV, GEOS, BAN, etc.,<LI>  the photometric photometry observations by
Gow, Lockwood, Spinrad, Wing, etc.
</UL>
<P>
Nowadays, the AAVSO includes red giants in its photoelectric
photometry survey (<I>e.g.</I> Percy et al., 1994), as well as the other 
societies which give a contribution to the observations of cool stars
(see GEOS Circulars, IBVS, etc.). Photographic monitoring by Latvian
astronomers led to the discovery of  anomalies in the light curves. In 1982,
red giants were targets in the ESO-LTPV project (Sterken, 1994) :
international teams collaborated for more than a decade (see Jorissen,
1994, for results on Barium and S stars).
<P>
For the past 10 years, automatic photometric telescopes (APT) have operated at
Mt. Hopkins for long-term monitoring of semi-regular variables (Baliunas
et al., 1987; Cristian et al., 1995).
<P>
More recently, MERLIN, a Multi telescope Radio-Linked Interferometer
Network, mapped out H2O emission in the inner CS envelope of Miras, SR,
and red supergiants, giving information about mass-loss (Yates and
Cohen, 1994), and observed OH/IR stars (Migenes et al., 1995).<BR> 
A radio survey could be organized in cooperation with optical
networks.
<P>
It appears evident that we need a world-wide coordinated monitoring of
long-period variables (LPVs) and semi-regular variables which will permit to detect unknown
important features in the light curves, and, consequently, to lay the
observational foundation for red-giant asteroseismology.<BR>
<P>
(to be continued)
<P>

<center><H3>References</H3></center>
<ol>
<li>Baliunas, S. L., Donahue, R. A., Loeser, J. G., Guinan, E. F.,
  Genet, R. M. and Boyd, L. J. 1987, in Eight Annual Fairborn - IAPPP
  Symposium: <I>New Generation Small Telescopes</I>, eds. D. S. Hayes,
  R. M. Genet and D. R. Genet (Fairborn Press), p. 97
<li>Belmonte, J. A. <I>et al.</I> (17 authors) 1994, <I>Astron. Astrophys.</I>,
  283, 121
<li>Breger, M. 1992, in First European Meeting of the AAVSO: <I>International
  Cooperation and Coordination in Variable Star Research</I>, eds. J. R. Percy
  J. A. Mattei and C. Sterken (Cambridge Univ. Press), p. 171
<li>Breger, M. 1994, in NATO Advanced Research Workshop: <I>The Impact of
  Long-Term Monitoring on Variable Star Research</I>, eds. C. Sterken and 
  M. de Groot (Kluwer Academic Pub.), p. 393
<li>Cristian, V. C., Donahue, R. A., Soon, W. H., Baliunas, S. L. and
  Henry, G. W. 1995, <I>Pub. Astron. Soc. Pacific</I>, 107, 411
<li>Horne, J. H. and Baliunas, S. L. 1986, <I>Ap. J.</I>, 302, 757
<li>Jorissen, A. 1994, in NATO Advanced Research Workshop: <I>The Impact of
  Long-Term Monitoring on Variable Star Research</I>, eds. C. Sterken and
  M. de Groot (Kluwer Academic Pub.), p. 143
<li>Migenes, V., Ludke, E., Cohen, R. J., Shepherd, M. and Bowers, P. F. 1995,
  <I>Astrophys. and Space Sc.</I>, 224, 515
<li>Percy, J. R. <I>et al.</I> (18 authors) 1994, <I>Pub. Astron. Soc.
  Pacific</I>, 106, 611
<li>Querci, F. R. 1986, in <I>The M-Type Stars</I>, eds. H. R. Johnson and
  F. R. Querci (Washington), NASA SP-492, p. 1
<li>Serre, T., Auvergne, M. and Goupil, H. J. 1992, <I>Astron. Astrophys.</I>,
  259, 404
<li>Sterken, C. 1988, in International Conference: <I>Coordination of
  Observational Projects in Astronomy</I>, eds. C. Jaschek and C. Sterken
  (Cambridge Univ. Press), p. 3
<li>Sterken, C. 1994, in NATO Advanced Research Workshop: <I>The Impact of
  Long-Term Monitoring on Variable Star Research</I>, eds. C. Sterken and
  M. de Groot (Kluwer Academic Pub.), p. 1
<li>Sullivan, D. F. 1995, <I>Baltic Astronomy</I>, 4, 467
<li>Szabados, L. 1994, in NATO Advanced Research Workshop: <I>The Impact of
  Long-Term Monitoring on Variable Star Research</I>, eds. C. Sterken and
  M. de Groot (Kluwer Academic Pub.), p. 213
<li>Yates, J. A. and Cohen, R. J. 1994, <I>Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.</I>,
  270, 958
<li>Young, A. T. 1994, in NATO Advanced Research Workshop: <I>The Impact of
  Long-Term Monitoring on Variable Star Research</I>, eds. C. Sterken and
  M. de Groot (Kluwer Academic Pub.), p.  421
</ol>

<p><a href="as1.html"><img src="../backarr.gif" border=0></a>

<hr>
<P><ADDRESS>
<I>Working Group <BR>
Mon Sep  1 13:42:51 GMT+0200 1997</I>
</ADDRESS>
</BODY>
</HTML>

